Happy Easter
to ALL our Readers
No, I’ve not
gone completely mad; it’s still Eastertide for all Christians, despite the
strangeness of Orthodox Christians celebrating the resurrection of Christ five
weeks later than the rest of us. Eastertide lasts until the Feast of Pentecost,
Whitsunday, the fiftieth day after Easter, so we’re still just in it, though
that’s a recent recovery of an ancient notion, because in our parents’ days
Eastertide was assumed to finish with Ascension Day (last Thursday). But our
Ethiopian Orthodox colleagues, who use St.Peter’s, were keeping Maundy Thursday
only a week before we kept Ascension Day, which was very unsettling. Two years
ago our Easter celebrations coincided, but this year, they kept the Great Feast
on 1st May.
People
sometimes ask me to explain why Orthodox Easter is different from ours, and my
stock answer has been, “It’s complicated” but that was mostly to gloss over the
fact that I wasn’t clear myself, but this year, with renewed public interest in
fixing a date for Easter, I have set myself to understand the conundrum. Here goes.
Lunar Months
and Solar Years
Obviously,
the basis of all calendar problems is that we use a solar year (the earth takes
about three hundred and sixty-five and a quarter days to go round the sun) and a
lunar month (the moon takes twenty nine and a bit days to go round the earth);
hence twelve lunar months don’t actually make up a solar year, so we lengthen
our months to fudge it, and then add in a leap day every four years to make up
for the quarter of a day (except when the year is divisible by 400). The
particular Easter problem is further confounded by the fact that we want it to
approximate to Passover, which is (broadly speaking) the first full moon after
the (northern hemisphere) spring equinox, so combining lunar and solar
calculations. In the Gospels it is clear that Jesus was crucified and rose
again around Passover time, so that is when Easter should be.
Quartodeciman
or Not
So the
Church’s earliest argument over the date of Easter was whether it should be on
a Sunday, or whether it should simply follow Passover on the 14th of
the Jewish month Nisan. Since the Jewish calendar was (and is) simply a lunar
one there is a problem of that date jumping forward by 11 days or so every
(solar) year, and so quite quickly it will predate the equinox (which the Jews
also regard as important, as Passover is a spring festival). The Jewish
solution is to add in an intercalary month before Nisan in years when Passover
would come before the equinox. This was felt unsatisfactory by the Fathers of
the Church, who also felt that the symbolism of Sunday was vital, since Sunday
had been the initial celebration of the resurrection. Hence from the end of the
3rd century Christians had to find a method of calculating their own
date.
Julius or
Gregory
So it was
agreed at the First Council of Nicaea in 325 that Easter Day should be
celebrated everywhere on the same day, but without definition. This came to be
the Sunday after the first full moon following the equinox, which was defined
as 21st March. Therein lies the problem. The Orthodox churches
insist on continuing to use the Julian calendar, which was in use at that time,
(invented by Julius Caesar) and so tie their calculation of Easter to 21st
March in the Julian calendar, rather than the actual equinox. To be fair, none
of us want to be bothered with real astronomical observations (notice the
problems that Muslims get into over the start and finish of Ramadan, over the
question of whether or not a new moon has been observed where they are) and so
all Easter calculations are based on notional events in order to be
predictable. The Julian calendar is too long, compared to the actual solar
year, by 3 days every 400 years, and so eventually the Gregorian calendar was
introduced, (by Pope Gregory XIII) which corrects that error. Rome adopted the Gregorian
calendar in 1582, England (always progressive) in 1752. In our century, the
Julian calendar is 13 days behind the Gregorian, and so the starting point for
the Orthodox calculation is 13 days later than the starting point for ours.
But Not Just
Thirteen Days
Unlike
Orthodox Christmas, which is simply 13 days after western Christmas, Easter
might be only a week later, or it might be 5 weeks later, or it might even be
the same, and that’s of course because the theoretical full moon intervenes in
the calculation. Matters are made more obscure by the fact that there are
different methods for calculating the theoretical lunar cycles, and of course
the Orthodox use a different (and older) method from the west. If you were,
like me, taken to church as a child where the Book of Common Prayer was in use,
you may remember the Golden Numbers and the inexplicable tables that were
printed in the back of that volume to enable you to calculate the date of
Easter, well that’s how complex it is! I don’t pretend to understand all that,
nor why the variation between the western date and the Orthodox date is almost
never 3 or 4 weeks. There are, in the end, things that can remain a mystery!
No comments:
Post a Comment